If we look at Desktop only (since Microsoft has no mobile OS) it is Chrome 65.14%, Edge 14.64%, Safari 8.06% and Firefox 6.09%.
From this we can conclude that Google and Apple are quite successful at keeping users of their OS on their browsers (Chrome and Safari), but Microsoft is not.
Despite the issues Mozilla mentions, it is mainly on Windows that alt browsers succeed.
The problem here perhaps is that if Microsoft makes it even easier for third-party browsers to succeed on Windows, the main beneficiary will be Google rather than Mozilla.
Havoc 8 hours ago [-]
> Microsoft is only willing to move where the law requires it, but not elsewhere.
Sounds on brand. They did have to be dragged to court first time round, can't imagine it'll be different future times
Though realistically Google needs to be next in line. Microsoft is quite capable of destroying their desktop monopoly on their own
If we look at Desktop only (since Microsoft has no mobile OS) it is Chrome 65.14%, Edge 14.64%, Safari 8.06% and Firefox 6.09%.
From this we can conclude that Google and Apple are quite successful at keeping users of their OS on their browsers (Chrome and Safari), but Microsoft is not.
Despite the issues Mozilla mentions, it is mainly on Windows that alt browsers succeed.
The problem here perhaps is that if Microsoft makes it even easier for third-party browsers to succeed on Windows, the main beneficiary will be Google rather than Mozilla.
Sounds on brand. They did have to be dragged to court first time round, can't imagine it'll be different future times
Though realistically Google needs to be next in line. Microsoft is quite capable of destroying their desktop monopoly on their own
Whos ? Mozilla's or Microsoft's ? Mozilla has been copying bad "design" from Microsoft since some time.